<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tags in Oracle Nested Tables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joelennon.ie/2010/07/13/storing-tags-in-oracle-using-nested-tables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joelennon.ie/2010/07/13/storing-tags-in-oracle-using-nested-tables/</link>
	<description>Rants, Raves &#38; Recommendations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Lennon</title>
		<link>http://www.joelennon.ie/2010/07/13/storing-tags-in-oracle-using-nested-tables/comment-page-1/#comment-8499</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joelennon.ie/?p=395#comment-8499</guid>
		<description>Well strictly speaking they are probably right. I don&#039;t believe nested tables are actually stored in the same table as the parent table, so there are issues with the argument that they have any particular benefit over traditional related tables. Some might argue that if you want to store self-contained document-oriented records, you should store the data in an XML column or store a big string of JSON and use something like PL/JSON to work with it.

Personally, I try not to get too bogged down about what certain people think and just go with whatever works right for me, and I like using the nested tables solution for tags, whether or not Tom Kyte thinks I should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well strictly speaking they are probably right. I don&#8217;t believe nested tables are actually stored in the same table as the parent table, so there are issues with the argument that they have any particular benefit over traditional related tables. Some might argue that if you want to store self-contained document-oriented records, you should store the data in an XML column or store a big string of JSON and use something like PL/JSON to work with it.</p>
<p>Personally, I try not to get too bogged down about what certain people think and just go with whatever works right for me, and I like using the nested tables solution for tags, whether or not Tom Kyte thinks I should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris marx</title>
		<link>http://www.joelennon.ie/2010/07/13/storing-tags-in-oracle-using-nested-tables/comment-page-1/#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator>chris marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joelennon.ie/?p=395#comment-8497</guid>
		<description>well, i agree, that&#039;s what got me on them too :)
but the dba&#039;s aren&#039;t sold yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i agree, that&#8217;s what got me on them too <img src='http://www.joelennon.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
but the dba&#8217;s aren&#8217;t sold yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Lennon</title>
		<link>http://www.joelennon.ie/2010/07/13/storing-tags-in-oracle-using-nested-tables/comment-page-1/#comment-8487</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joelennon.ie/?p=395#comment-8487</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fair point Chris. I guess what I like about them is it allows you to use Oracle to store data much like a document-oriented database (e.g. CouchDB) would - with everything related to a record self-contained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fair point Chris. I guess what I like about them is it allows you to use Oracle to store data much like a document-oriented database (e.g. CouchDB) would &#8211; with everything related to a record self-contained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris marx</title>
		<link>http://www.joelennon.ie/2010/07/13/storing-tags-in-oracle-using-nested-tables/comment-page-1/#comment-8278</link>
		<dc:creator>chris marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joelennon.ie/?p=395#comment-8278</guid>
		<description>Any responses to those who say that nested tables are just parent/child tables in disguise, and that it actually makes it harder to deal with the data?

http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8135488196597</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any responses to those who say that nested tables are just parent/child tables in disguise, and that it actually makes it harder to deal with the data?</p>
<p><a href="http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8135488196597" rel="nofollow">http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8135488196597</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

